Counterpart vs
Marsh McLennan Agency: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
Counterpart lists medical malpractice; Marsh McLennan Agency lists builders risk, cargo transit, commercial auto. Their published catalogs also share 6 lines, including crime, directors and officers, employment practices. Use the differences to frame the same quote request for both, then confirm the producer, insurer, and policy terms; a listed product does not establish availability or equivalent coverage.
An Overview of Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency
What Stands Out About Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency?
Counterpart at a Glance
- Counterpart lists private-company and nonprofit D&O, employment practices, fiduciary, crime, professional and lawyers liability, among other lines. 1,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17Current site marketing catalogue checked September 29, 2026. Marketing membership is separate from acceptance of a three-claim line-comparison offering.
- Counterpart’s dashboard shows broker submission statuses from in progress through underwriting review and quote. 7Company-described broker workflow in a July 2025 article; not independently tested.
Marsh McLennan Agency at a Glance
- MMA says its Marsh Agency business unit serves as an advocate and broker for the middle market. 30Company-stated role and customer focus for the future Marsh Agency operating brand; not a revenue, size, or eligibility threshold.
- MMA lists business insurance, employee health and benefits, retirement and wealth, and private-client insurance services across the U.S. and Canada. 19Current MMA company description. Does not establish corporate ownership structure, the legal entity for a particular placement, or an insurer role.
Counterpart vs Marsh McLennan Agency Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means this catalogue has no separate offering recorded; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency Coverage, Line by Line
Open what Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency each document for one coverage line.
Crime Insurance
D&O Insurance
Employment Practices Liability Insurance
Fiduciary Liability Insurance
General Liability Insurance
Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance
Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency Reliability Scores
Each score uses the rubric for that provider’s documented role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
Counterpart Reliability Scores
No Reliability Score
Marsh McLennan Agency Reliability Scores
No Reliability Score
Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for the sources, scope, and calculation.
Counterpart Review Score
No reviews found
We found no independent customer rating of Counterpart, so it has no Review Score. Its Trustpilot page shows no reviews, and BBB has no matching business.
Read Counterpart reviewsMarsh McLennan Agency Review Score
2 rated sources
There are almost no public customer reviews of Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA). Trustpilot shows 3.2 out of 5, but from a single review, and BBB shows an A grade with four complaints closed in three years.
Read Marsh McLennan Agency reviewsWhere Do the Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency Buying Paths Differ?
Counterpart describes its route this way: A February 2025 Counterpart help article describes a wholesale-broker referral route. Its current homepage also shows “Quote Online,” but we couldn’t confirm whether the current path is broker-assisted or lets a buyer quote, purchase or bind directly. 6 1 Marsh McLennan Agency describes its route this way: MMA lists general liability, commercial property, workers’ compensation, professional liability, commercial auto, and cyber liability for small businesses, and invites buyers to call for a personalized quote. It does not describe an online purchase or binding route. 32 The useful distinction is where the first submission goes and who continues with the account. Ask who gathers information, who can bind, which legal producer appears on the proposal, and who remains your day-to-day contact; a quote request alone does not establish an issued policy.
How Do Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency Differ on Customer Fit?
Counterpart lists its business focus as Management and professional liability products for small businesses, with tools and services for brokers, as described by Counterpart. 1 2 Marsh McLennan Agency lists its business focus as Business insurance and employee health and benefits, with retirement, wealth, and private-client services also listed for the United States and Canada. 19 Match those stated audiences to your operations, locations, contracts, and loss history, then ask which practice or team would service the account. A stated focus is not an eligibility decision.
The published catalogs list Counterpart lines not listed by Marsh McLennan Agency: medical malpractice; Marsh McLennan Agency lines not listed by Counterpart: builders risk, cargo transit, commercial auto. These differences do not establish that either company excludes a line or will quote your risk. 15 13 29 26 32 24
Both providers list crime, directors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary, general liability, professional E&O. Treat that overlap as a shortlist for a side-by-side proposal review, not proof of matching policy language. For each line, compare the named insurer, insured entities, limits, deductibles or retentions, exclusions, endorsements, retroactive dates where relevant, and state-specific terms. 13 9 24
What Service Questions Apply to Counterpart and Marsh McLennan Agency?
For Counterpart, published service information says: Counterpart says brokers can renew professional-liability accounts in a few clicks and can speak with profession-specialized underwriters. This is not a measured renewal time or a promise of automatic, guaranteed or direct insured renewal. 8 For Marsh McLennan Agency, it says: MMA says the Marsh Agency brand transition will not change clients’ account manager, team, or point of contact, and will not affect existing policies or programs; clients may see the legal-name change during renewals. This describes the rebrand transition, not MMA’s general renewal process. 30 Before binding, agree on routine endorsement requests, certificates, renewal timing, claim-notice instructions, and any fee or commission disclosure that applies to your account. Claims assistance or a service portal does not determine whether a loss is covered.
For a useful quote comparison, request the same limits and relevant endorsements from both sides, then check the full forms and itemized premium, fees, taxes, and financing charges. Confirm any account-specific unknowns with the producer and insurer named on the proposal.
Counterpart vs Marsh McLennan Agency Services Compared
What each provider documents about the services you may need
35 documents, numbered as cited. Open the sources
Sources for Counterpart vs Marsh McLennan Agency
Comparisons Related to Counterpart vs Marsh McLennan Agency
Compare AIG's broker and agent application portal with Counterpart's quote entry whose binding route remains unclear; check product fit, service and policy-specific terms.
Compare AIG and Marsh McLennan Agency on documented customer fit, product overlap, quote access, and the questions to resolve before choosing a policy.
Compare Alliance Risk vs Counterpart on roles, coverage, application, service and buyer questions.
