Beazley vs Counterpart: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?

Your policy comes from a Beazley underwriting company, not the service entity: Beazley is a specialty insurance group, while Beazley USA Services, Inc. reports doing business in California as Beazley Insurance Services under company-disclosed license 0G55497. The license was not independently verified. ^5,6,7Company-reported. US group and disclosed insurance-services entity; no regulator verification or product-specific producer appointment established.

Counterpart says its U.S. products are offered by its wholly owned subsidiary, Counterpart Insurance Services, Inc., which it identifies as a licensed producer and surplus-lines broker. The company says the issuing carrier is responsible for policy obligations. ²³Company-reported. Provider-published U.S. distribution disclosure; this does not rule out an additional delegated program role.

Small technology and business-services companies can consider MediaTech; digital-health buyers can look at Virtual Care, while Beazley’s Life Sciences offering targets middle and large organizations. ^1,13,14Company-reported. Product-specific audiences; funding stage is not an eligibility criterion established by these sources.

Counterpart describes management and professional liability products for small businesses and presents both brokers and small businesses as audiences. This stated focus does not establish independent eligibility or appetite. ^21,22Company-reported. Current company marketing for U.S. audiences.

MediaTech puts technology and professional E&O, media liability and cyber in one package; Beazley lists breach response, business interruption, dependent interruption, extortion, data recovery and eCrime up to $5 million, but the issued policy sets actual coverage. ¹Company-reported. US small-business MediaTech marketing; maximum is advertised capacity, not a guaranteed quote.

Review exclusions before relying on MediaTech for IP disputes: the linked February 2019 sample excludes patent infringement and trade-secret misappropriation tied to technology or other products and restricts contractual liability and retroactive dates. It is not current quote wording. ^3,5Company-reported. F00731 022019; exclusions on printed pages 16–18; qualified reviewer must interpret a current quote form.

Private companies can choose separate or shared limits across D&O, employment practices and fiduciary liability under Execuguard; admitted or non-admitted options still depend on state and account eligibility. ¹⁰Company-reported. US Execuguard; no assertion every coverage is included in every quote.

Businesses concerned about fraudulent instructions can ask Beazley about its Commercial Crime or Financial Fidelity Bond products; the described protection may require out-of-band authentication or added premium for documented controls. ¹¹Company-reported. US crime and fidelity offering; financial-institution bonds are distinct from fiduciary liability.

Digital-health buyers can compare Virtual Care’s healthcare, technology, cyber, media, general and product liability; life-sciences businesses can consider BioSecure, NutraGuard or WellTech for product, professional and general liability. ^13,14Company-reported. Specialty healthcare packages, not universal MediaTech benefits.

Mid-sized and large property owners can ask about North American Commercial Property on an excess-and-surplus basis; manufacturers can separately consider Product Recall for removal and related income-loss costs. ^15,16Company-reported. Separate US-marketed product routes; commercial property is not a business owner’s policy.

Environmental-service firms can consider BeazleyOne Environmental’s combined general, professional and pollution liability; marine operators can ask about hull and marine liability. These do not establish a general corporate umbrella. ^17,18Company-reported. Industry-specific products; marine builders risk is not mapped to general construction builders risk.

Companies buying or selling a business can ask about representations-and-warranties insurance; Beazley also places specialist programs through MGAs and brokers for professional, general, product, manufacturers’ E&O, cyber and allied-medical risks. ^12,19Company-reported. Transaction insurance and delegated programs are distinct from a small-business direct purchase flow.

For liability claims, confirm the reporting window and limit available after defense costs: Beazley’s application says coverage is claims-made and reported, with claims expenses reducing the limit and subject to retentions. ²Company-reported. Application notice, page 1; current issued wording and endorsements control.

Counterpart’s current product pages list private-company and not-for-profit D&O, employment-practices, fiduciary, crime, professional/general liability, allied healthcare, architects/engineers/contractors and lawyers liability. Several lines appear only as a component or product-specific feature; availability, eligibility and terms depend on the actual program and policy. ^{21,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37}Company-reported. Current site marketing catalogue checked September 29, 2026. Marketing membership is separate from acceptance of a three-claim line-comparison offering.

Prepare company services, products, employee count, US and foreign revenue, financial statements and expected changes for a MediaTech application; Beazley accepts placement through third-party platforms or email, but submission is not acceptance or binding. ^1,2Company-reported. Published small-business placement description and F00859 042022; no application submitted or binding time tested.

A February 2025 Counterpart help article describes a wholesale-broker referral route. Its current homepage also shows “Quote Online,” but we couldn’t confirm whether the current path is broker-assisted or lets a buyer quote, purchase or bind directly. ^26,21,25Conflicting sources. Older dated directions conflict with or leave an ambiguity beside a current digital quote CTA; no form or transaction was tested.

Counterpart says its dashboard shows broker-submission statuses from in progress through underwriting review and quote; its article says binding requires a signed application and any required subjectivities. ²⁷Company-reported. Company-described broker workflow in a July 2025 article; not independently tested.

Do not assume renewal or service speed: Beazley publishes a MediaTech renewal application, but no guarantee, dedicated account manager or policy-change turnaround was established. ^4,1Company-reported. Public renewal document and service description; no policyholder account or service performance tested.

Small businesses under $35 million in revenue may consider Beazley’s broker myBeazley quote-and-bind route for eligible cyber accounts with limits up to $5 million; Full Spectrum Cyber combines breach response with security tools. These route criteria do not establish MediaTech eligibility. ⁹Company-reported. Small-business Full Spectrum Cyber only; services, costs and entitlements depend on actual arrangements.

Counterpart says brokers can renew professional-liability accounts in a few clicks and can speak with profession-specialized underwriters. This is not a measured renewal time or a promise of automatic, guaranteed or direct insured renewal. ²⁸Company-reported. Company-described professional-liability broker service.

Request an itemized premium and broker compensation disclosure because reviewed MediaTech materials do not publish a buyer-specific price, commission rate or fee schedule. ^1,2,6Not publicly disclosed. Scoped review of public MediaTech purchase materials, not all Beazley group compensation arrangements.

Counterpart’s license disclosure says its subsidiary may receive compensation from an insurer or intermediary and that commissions or fees are set by the underwriting insurer. The reviewed disclosure does not state the amount applicable to a particular buyer or quote. ²³Company-reported. Provider-published disclosure, no buyer-specific amount.