At-Bay vs CFC: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?

Pre-revenue startups can assess CFC’s broader technology package; At-Bay combines technology E&O and cyber coverage in one specialist product.

An Overview of At-Bay and CFC

A pre-revenue software company can face customer obligations before building a revenue history: CFC explicitly includes pre-revenue firms and describes technology, cyber, media and intellectual-property elements, while At-Bay combines technology E&O and cyber. 14 15 2 Choose CFC if you are pre-revenue and need its broader technology package; choose At-Bay if combined technology E&O and cyber fit your software risks.

What Stands Out About At-Bay and CFC?

At-Bay at a Glance

  • Combine technology E&O and cyber protection in one policy. 2Company-reportedProduct highlights, not an issued policy or universal contract coverage.
  • Eligible policyholders get monitoring, training and cyber-advisor access; managed detection and response costs extra. 7Company-reportedCurrent service descriptions and footnotes; no claims of effectiveness or independent testing.

CFC at a Glance

  • Eligible technology businesses can combine E&O, cyber, media/IP and general liability. 15Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
  • Cyber policyholders may get threat monitoring, alerts and 24/7 incident support. 20Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

At-Bay vs CFC Coverage Lines Compared

CoverageAt-BayCFC
Commercial propertyNot listedListed 26CFC offers property coverage within its property and casualty product.
CrimeNot listedListed 24,36CFC offers crime in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.
Cyber liabilityListed 3At-Bay offers primary and excess cyber insurance for businesses with revenue up to $5 billion.Listed 22CFC offers cyber insurance, including primary and excess products.
Directors and officersNot listedListed 24CFC offers directors and officers liability in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.
Employment practices liabilityNot listedListed 24CFC offers employment practices liability in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies. CFC does not write standalone employment practices liability.
Fiduciary liabilityNot listedListed 24CFC offers fiduciary liability in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.
General liabilityNot listedListed 26CFC offers general liability within its property and casualty product.
Intellectual propertyNot listedListed 27CFC offers intellectual-property insurance for eligible businesses with revenue up to $500 million, depending on industry.
Kidnap and ransomNot listedListed 28CFC offers kidnap and ransom insurance, including a specialist marine product.
Management liabilityNot listedListed 23,24CFC offers a US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.
Media liabilityNot listedListed 34CFC offers media liability insurance for content creators and media businesses.
Product liabilityNot listedListed 35CFC offers product liability within its life-science and nutraceutical policies.
Product recallNot listedListed 29CFC offers product-recall and contaminated-product-recall insurance.
Professional errors and omissions (E&O)Listed 4At-Bay offers primary miscellaneous professional liability insurance.Listed 25CFC offers professional liability insurance for professional-service businesses.
Representations and warrantiesNot listedListed 30CFC offers buyer-side and seller-side representations and warranties insurance.
Technology errors and omissions (E&O)Listed 2At-Bay offers primary and excess technology errors and omissions insurance for businesses with revenue up to $5 billion.Listed 15CFC offers technology errors and omissions for technology businesses.
Umbrella and excess liabilityNot listedListed 31CFC offers excess professional liability, general liability and cyber limits for small and micro businesses.
Virtual care and telehealthNot listedListed 32CFC offers an eHealth package for businesses delivering health care through technology, including telemedicine.

A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means this catalogue has no separate offering recorded; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.

At-Bay and CFC Coverage, Line by Line

Open what At-Bay and CFC each document for one coverage line.

At-Bay and CFC Reliability Scores

Each score uses the rubric for that provider’s documented role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.

CFC Reliability Scores

Managing general agent

Carrier & MGA

No Reliability Score

Provider assessment

At-Bay and CFC Review Scores for 2026

These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for the sources, scope, and calculation.

At-Bay Review Score

9.5/ 10

Review Score

2 rated sources

At-Bay’s public review evidence is thin: one old G2 review and a BBB complaint record. It is not enough to judge day-to-day service or claims handling.

Read At-Bay reviews

CFC Review Score

–/ 10

Review Score

No reviews found

The reviewed sources did not yield customer reviews of CFC; the available survey concerns UK brokers. The one rating we found is from UK brokers: 4.76 out of 5 in Insurance Times’ 2024/25 survey.

Read CFC reviews

Key Differences Between At-Bay and CFC

Intellectual Property Is Not One Coverage Promise

CFC’s technology package includes IP-related language, while it separately markets intellectual-property insurance. The separate product’s scope should not be imported into the technology package. Ask which rights and allegations the quoted form addresses, especially if a customer asks for broad infringement indemnity. At-Bay’s technology description similarly needs supporting wording for the obligation at issue. 15 27 2

California Restrictions Must Stay Attached to Their Product

CFC’s management-liability materials decline California-domiciled businesses and standalone EPL in that program. That restriction is not evidence that all CFC technology coverage is unavailable in California. The reviewed public documentation leaves the technology route unresolved, as it does At-Bay’s current product acceptance. Ask a broker for product-specific confirmation on both sides. 24 17 5

Both Require the Actual Placement Details

CFC’s MGA role and its references to Lloyd’s arrangements do not identify every policy’s insurer. At-Bay’s historical own-paper announcement also cannot settle the current issuer. CFC’s technology application and At-Bay’s platform describe broker-mediated underwriting, so a founder should plan for a completed submission rather than infer automatic acceptance from the audience description. 17 16 11 6

What Should You Confirm in At-Bay and CFC Quotes?

Provide revenue stage, planned launch, contracts and IP obligations. Request the proposed forms, California route, insurer, accepted professional services and any separate IP policy. Compare cyber response services by included tasks and charges, not by an unverified promise of incident outcomes. 20 7

At-Bay vs CFC Services Compared

What each provider documents about the services you may need

CriteriaAt-BayCFC
Business role

At-Bay offers cyber, technology E&O and miscellaneous professional liability, with coverage described as underwritten by non-admitted insurers. At-Bay Insurance Services LLC is its disclosed property-and-casualty agency and surplus-lines broker. 1,5Company-reportedUS brand and disclosed producer; company statements, not regulatory verification.

CFC can quote specialist cover as an MGA, meaning it performs some underwriting functions for insurers that carry the risk. Its disclosures identify CFC Underwriting Limited and U.S. producer CFC USA, Inc.; the CFC brand is not the insurer name on every policy. 18,17Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Customer focus

Large technology companies may fit At-Bay’s published Tech E&O appetite, but the quote route matters: its product page lists up to $5 billion revenue and $10 million limits, while its broker platform lists $100 million and $3 million. These are ceilings, not guaranteed offers. 2Company-reportedCurrent product-page appetite; no inference of pre-revenue, industry-specific or California eligibility.

A September 2023 Tech E&O appetite PDF still accessible on At-Bay’s site has lower revenue and limit ceilings than the current product page and lists restricted classes including autonomous AI. It should not be treated as current eligibility guidance; ask underwriting for the applicable appetite version. 12,2Company-reportedLegacy document has inconsistent autoquote revenue figures internally. Current HTML controls description of advertised ceilings, but current class eligibility remains unresolved.

Startups through multinationals can ask CFC about technology coverage, including before generating revenue; the stated audience does not guarantee a particular business will qualify. 14Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Availability

California buyers should still confirm their product’s eligibility: At-Bay lists license 0L73812 for At-Bay Insurance Services LLC, but this company disclosure was not independently checked and does not establish a specific policy is available. 5Company-reportedCalifornia producer route; no regulator record retrieved.

Get written California eligibility for your exact business and product before planning around a quote; reviewed product pages do not establish a current California issuer, and MPL has state restrictions. 5,2,3,4Not found in reviewed sourcesReviewed official HTML product pages and license table on September 16, 2026; current linked appetite PDFs could not be retrieved.

California buyers should confirm product eligibility and current license authority before applying: CFC reports all-state producer licenses and surplus-lines authorization in four states, including California. It identifies CFC General Insurance Agency, Inc. as its California licensing name; this disclosure was not independently checked. 17Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

California-domiciled businesses should look elsewhere for the described management-liability product, and standalone EPL is also listed as declined. This restriction applies to the January 2026 brochure’s offering, not every CFC product. 24Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Ask CFC for a current California eligibility answer before spending time on a technology application; reviewed pages do not establish the route for a particular startup. A 2023 admitted Tech E&O announcement does not supply a current product schedule. 14,15,16,42Not found in reviewed sourcesCalifornia technology-product access only. General producer authorization is separate from product eligibility. No live quote or state filing was obtained.

Application process

An online quote is not bound coverage; At-Bay’s broker process still requires application review, chosen limits and retentions, documents, effective date, contingencies and signatures before binding. 6,4Company-reportedPublic broker workflow; no application submitted and no speed guarantee inferred.

A senior staff member should expect to complete the technology application and send it to a broker; it asks for revenue, funding, subsidiaries, products, contracts, security, IP procedures and claims history. CFC Connect separately supports broker trading and appointments. 16,19Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Sources

42 documents, numbered as cited.

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, email The General Average with the page URL and supporting source.

Comparisons Related to At-Bay vs CFC

  • At-Bay publishes cyber, technology E&O and professional-liability routes with security services; AIG lists broader commercial products and broker tools.

  • CFC describes specialist technology underwriting and cyber-response services through an MGA route; AIG lists broader commercial options submitted through brokers and agents.

  • At-Bay's technology E&O discusses service-credit claims and separate Stance security services; Alliance Risk reviews technology contracts and existing coverage.

All Comparisons

Want someone to handle this for you?

Spot, which publishes this research, gets quotes from 50+ providers, picks the options that fit your coverage and budget, and manages renewals after you buy. The first consultation is free. Book a free consultation