
New Hampshire contract-frustration coverage guide
The New Hampshire Supreme Court held that the common-law defenses of impossibility, impracticability and frustration of commercial purpose remain available unless expressly waived; a clause protecting only one party does not alone waive the other party’s defenses. The court answered a narrow certified question about a specific international tour and air-charter agreement, not whether the customer ultimately proved a defense. New Hampshire’s UCC excuse provision, by contrast, concerns seller delay or nondelivery under a sale of goods. Buyers should identify whether their affected promise is goods or services, negotiate who gets force-majeure protection and ask what rights are expressly waived; none of this determines insurance payment.
What Is Contract Frustration Insurance?
Contract frustration may fit your business when an international contract is exposed to political disruption or government action. If your main risk is a customer who cannot pay, compare trade-credit coverage instead. Read the national Contract frustration guide.
What to Watch for With Contract Frustration in New Hampshire
Do not assume the other party loses every common-law defense
In the 2024 certified-question decision, a New Hampshire air-charter provider’s agreement with a tour operator protected the provider against defined force-majeure losses, including epidemics and acts of civil or military authority. The New Hampshire Supreme Court held the one-sided clause did not by itself relinquish the unprotected party’s common-law defenses; express language or other waiver evidence is a separate question. 1
The case involved services supporting tours abroad
The contract required air transportation for the New Zealand portion of Australia/New Zealand tours and a minimum number of tours; New Zealand’s border closure prevented the tours. For a tour, charter, logistics or other service contract, ask which government’s actions affect the exact promised service, minimum commitment, cancellation charges and substitute performance. Do not describe it as a goods-sale rule. 1,2
New Hampshire’s UCC government-order excuse is limited to goods sales
RSA 382-A Article 2 applies to transactions in goods, with a special rule for hybrid contracts. Section 2-615 concerns seller delay or nondelivery in a sale of goods and sets notice/allocation requirements. It does not answer the common-law defenses in the service-contract dispute in PJS v. Tauck. 2,3
Providers With New Hampshire License Records
No provider in our research documents both a state license record and this coverage line. This does not establish that providers are unlicensed. Check the regulator’s license lookup and confirm availability with a provider when requesting a quote.
Who Regulates Insurance in New Hampshire?

New Hampshire Insurance Department
The New Hampshire Insurance Department licenses insurance producers and insurers, oversees insurance markets and investigates complaints concerning entities within the Commissioner’s authority. Its consumer services line is 800-852-3416. 4,5,6,7
Surplus-Lines Tax and Stamping Office in New Hampshire
Reported tax rate. 3% on the New Hampshire allocation; other-state allocations use those states’ rates and fees 8,9,10
New Hampshire charges 3% on gross premium allocated to New Hampshire; for multistate coverage, premium allocated elsewhere is taxed at the rates and fees applicable in those jurisdictions, less qualifying returned premium. The policy notice states that the New Hampshire Guaranty Association will not be liable for surplus-lines policies; placement ordinarily requires proof that admitted coverage cannot be obtained.
Questions to Ask Before You Buy Contract Frustration in New Hampshire
- What is the governing law, and is the disrupted promise a sale of goods, a service or a hybrid transaction under RSA 382-A:2-102?
- Does the force-majeure clause protect both parties, identify civil-authority or border closures, cover minimum-purchase or cancellation fees, and expressly waive common-law defenses?
- For a proposed policy, which insured interest, contract, foreign government event and defined loss are covered, and what exclusions or notice conditions apply?
Contract Frustration Insurance in New Hampshire: FAQ
Does a one-sided New Hampshire force-majeure clause automatically waive the other side’s frustration defense?
No. The New Hampshire Supreme Court answered that narrow certified question in PJS v. Tauck: the defenses remain available unless expressly waived, and the one-sided clause alone was insufficient. The decision did not decide whether Tauck would ultimately prove a defense under the parties’ facts and contract. 1
Does RSA 382-A:2-615 apply to every disrupted international contract?
Contract Frustration Insurance Guides for Other States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Other coverage in New HampshireEvery coverage guide for New Hampshire, plus the regulator and surplus-lines details.17 documents, numbered as cited. Open the sources